|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
3" Exhaust
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: houston
Posts: 160
![]() |
if i had a choice between the new skyline and the supra, i would go for the skyline cause not only is it powerful and sweet lookin, but im a skyline fan myself and i would spend all day and night studying it and learning every aspec about it. if i was rich i wouldnt just own a wrench i would have a shop in my living room..
__________________
Rollin in a 98, flippin 94's |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
3" Exhaust
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Michigan
Posts: 213
![]() |
I love Supras to death always have and always will. but i am a little disappointed that they are switching to the v8. i am glad that the Skyline is going stick to its roots. i hope toyota will go back after they see how much better the skyline is gonna be.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
500whp yet?
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Long branch, NJ
Posts: 1,006
![]() |
Another thing, For the rich older people who mostly can afford these cars, and a lot of other people, There not gona crank their cars up to 4k rpms and above to get power out of them. They want to step on the gas and have the car accelerate, fast. Somethign hard with a turbo. Thats why BMWs, Benzs, Caddilacs, All have large high torque motors. And I dont know why everyone is so against the supra having a v8. Sure, The straight 6 is cool, But whats the difference? It makes power, Wheter it be turbo or not. And, point of view dependant, Big powerful N/A motors are a lot more pleasureable to drive. Anywhere the tach is, Hit the gas, Get stuffed into the seat. But at other times the "rush" of the turbo is also fun. But people dont feel like having to plan on accelerating and keeping the motor at 4k rpms and the turbo spooled. Thats probably why they are probably making it n/a.
__________________
Yay the supra assistant is gone!!! WEEE!! |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Stock
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Montreal
Posts: 1
![]() |
I remember finding a site saying that they were going to put two different engines in the supra, a v6 putting out 350hp For the convertible version and a v8 for the hard top. Sounds a lil sketch to me but who knows? Nothing, even the existence of the car is for sure right now.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |||
|
1000whp postwhore
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Chi-Town
Posts: 1,643
![]() |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
the new skyline doesnt even have the rb26dett it doesnt have the inline 6 and the car doesnt look like it can take abuse the car has lost its legendary engine the skyline jus has a glorified vq 3.5 engine with twins its the same powerplant with the g35, and the 350z its not unique anymore
__________________
http://www.myspace.com/supra_2nr ![]() Into Bikes now,, apparently the supra couldnt kill me, so my zx6 might lol |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
500whp yet?
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Long branch, NJ
Posts: 1,006
![]() |
Ill just not ever be able to afford either of these cars so I dont have much of an opinion. But I think the skyline looks a lot more like the old skyline than the supras do. I still think they should have kept the celica and supra big and little cousins. It would be better if they kept it in its mk3 market among the rx7 and mustangs and camaros and stuff, Instead of trying to move it up a notch to the all-out sports car class, Even tho mazda did with the rx7. Dont even get me started on the rx8...But It would be cool if they made the supra affordable again, in the 25-35K range, Instead of trying to make it compete in the super sports car market. Then more supra fans would actually buy them, And theyd be in the hands of those who would really appreciate the car. And i still wouldnt mind it having a dohc v8
__________________
Yay the supra assistant is gone!!! WEEE!! |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
1000whp postwhore
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Chi-Town
Posts: 1,643
![]() |
Quote:
these car were meant to be taken care of but not get lockd up in a damn garage, jus to only see the light of day in a sunday morning cruise, i think if the car can talk, it'll bitch about not being driven i mean, it was design to racing conditions why not take advantage of it? most of the engine designs now are becoming more mod-friendly so why not mod it? why more pple care about the value of the car rather than the performance? but all we can do is hope for the best when it comes to these new designs/models our generation of driving is passing soon pple are gonna be wusses, dont even know how to drive a stick all they're gonna have is a Pussy-Ass Paddle Shifter whats so hard about stepping on the clutch isnt the heel-and-toe, one of the main basics of driving? wussap with that? well good luck wit em, hope thier right leg grows bigger than the left lol
__________________
http://www.myspace.com/supra_2nr ![]() Into Bikes now,, apparently the supra couldnt kill me, so my zx6 might lol |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Stock
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Orlando Florida
Posts: 22
![]() |
i agree with everything you guys have said!
but toyota on the other hands have gottne a little horny, off the idea of having v8 in their line up, and thus have lost the true essence of the car. correct me if i'm wrong but small block v8's manage to stay a little cooler than a big 6 right? is that why the skyline devolpment team has put so much time into keeping the car cool? another thing, the mkV is not that hot i'm sorry but the mkIV's have a beautiful design that is ageless, i would be plenty happy with a supra that looked like an mkIV with the fortune 03' body kit from vielside =D ok ok last thing if the skyline does end up kiking the mkV's but then maybe toyota will be forced to make an mkVI! and if i was in charge of toyota my MKVI would be a 4.5L V6 sequentially twin turbo charged i'd call it the 3JZ-GTTE and it would look like just like a mkIV with the fortune 03' body kit from veilside Thats My MKVI ^
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
1000whp postwhore
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Chi-Town
Posts: 1,643
![]() |
what about a quad-turbo v8
with a 6.0 displament and a turbo for every two cylinders basically a twin on each side thats my idea of a 4jz-gtttte lol (i kno its jus gte but its more fun this way) or u kno what, why not go crazy why not put two inline-6 engines together that way your gonna have a v12 do the quad turbo idea so it'll have a turbo for every 3 cylinders how much horses do u think something like that can produce?
__________________
http://www.myspace.com/supra_2nr ![]() Into Bikes now,, apparently the supra couldnt kill me, so my zx6 might lol Last edited by Supra2NR; 11-05-2006 at 04:07 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Stock
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Sactown, CA
Posts: 5
![]() |
i vote no on the v8 but i guess if they were to come out with it, it'll be to compete with the american muscles? I don't know
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Dream Offer | Karma_Supra | MKIV Supra | 22 | 10-17-2007 03:04 PM |
| RX7 FD TT (92-01) VS Skyline R32 GT-R (89-92) VS Supra MKIV TT ? | Feel-IX | Non-Generation Specific Questions | 8 | 07-19-2007 02:18 AM |
| skyline taillights for my 87 supra | famous | Non-Generation Specific Questions | 2 | 08-14-2006 10:46 AM |
| video: highly tuned R34 Skyline and MK4 Supra (on the track) | white2abbit | MKIV Supra | 0 | 02-18-2006 07:37 AM |
| R32 Skyline GTR vs 4th Gen Supra | insane_snowman | MKIV Supra | 17 | 12-07-2005 02:49 PM |