|
![]() |
#1 |
500whp yet?
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Mechanicsville, MD, US of A, 20659
Posts: 1,060
![]() |
![]()
no offense but i would never dream of owning a 70k+ car in this lifetime. the new skyline might be coming to america but the only ppl that will be able to afford them are the same as those that buy the vipers, and which do you think they will get? a 6cylinder tt or a v10/v12 w/e they have.
__________________
88 N/A w/ 5spd - stock - not running, bhg 87 turbo/targa w/ 5spd- fidanza light weight flywheel, new oem slave cylinder, apexi air filter, no ac and no heat |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Stock
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 25
![]() |
![]()
If you ask me... Cars are much better with lower number of cylinders... v10's and v12s may have quite a bit of power, but they are built to have that many cylinders push the shaft. V6's Are built to have 6 push. Once you get a Twin Turbo in there they are pushing must faster then a v10 or v12. I think putting a v10 or v12 in anything besides a huge truck or machinary is rather stupid.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
3" Exhaust
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Sask/Canada
Posts: 238
![]() |
![]()
boost is a replacement for displacement
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
500whp yet?
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Mechanicsville, MD, US of A, 20659
Posts: 1,060
![]() |
![]()
oh dont misunderstand me. im only saying the only ppl able to afford the car or the 45+ guys that just cruise in the car and dont even own a wrench. if i had that much money id buy a stock mkiv and use the left over money and build a mean street car.
__________________
88 N/A w/ 5spd - stock - not running, bhg 87 turbo/targa w/ 5spd- fidanza light weight flywheel, new oem slave cylinder, apexi air filter, no ac and no heat |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
3" Exhaust
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: houston
Posts: 160
![]() |
![]()
if i had a choice between the new skyline and the supra, i would go for the skyline cause not only is it powerful and sweet lookin, but im a skyline fan myself and i would spend all day and night studying it and learning every aspec about it. if i was rich i wouldnt just own a wrench i would have a shop in my living room..
__________________
Rollin in a 98, flippin 94's |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
3" Exhaust
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Michigan
Posts: 213
![]() |
![]()
I love Supras to death always have and always will. but i am a little disappointed that they are switching to the v8. i am glad that the Skyline is going stick to its roots. i hope toyota will go back after they see how much better the skyline is gonna be.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
500whp yet?
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Long branch, NJ
Posts: 1,006
![]() |
![]()
Another thing, For the rich older people who mostly can afford these cars, and a lot of other people, There not gona crank their cars up to 4k rpms and above to get power out of them. They want to step on the gas and have the car accelerate, fast. Somethign hard with a turbo. Thats why BMWs, Benzs, Caddilacs, All have large high torque motors. And I dont know why everyone is so against the supra having a v8. Sure, The straight 6 is cool, But whats the difference? It makes power, Wheter it be turbo or not. And, point of view dependant, Big powerful N/A motors are a lot more pleasureable to drive. Anywhere the tach is, Hit the gas, Get stuffed into the seat. But at other times the "rush" of the turbo is also fun. But people dont feel like having to plan on accelerating and keeping the motor at 4k rpms and the turbo spooled. Thats probably why they are probably making it n/a.
__________________
Yay the supra assistant is gone!!! WEEE!! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Stock
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Orlando Florida
Posts: 22
![]() |
![]()
i agree with everything you guys have said!
but toyota on the other hands have gottne a little horny, off the idea of having v8 in their line up, and thus have lost the true essence of the car. correct me if i'm wrong but small block v8's manage to stay a little cooler than a big 6 right? is that why the skyline devolpment team has put so much time into keeping the car cool? another thing, the mkV is not that hot i'm sorry but the mkIV's have a beautiful design that is ageless, i would be plenty happy with a supra that looked like an mkIV with the fortune 03' body kit from vielside =D ok ok last thing if the skyline does end up kiking the mkV's but then maybe toyota will be forced to make an mkVI! and if i was in charge of toyota my MKVI would be a 4.5L V6 sequentially twin turbo charged i'd call it the 3JZ-GTTE and it would look like just like a mkIV with the fortune 03' body kit from veilside Thats My MKVI ^ ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Stock
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Sactown, CA
Posts: 5
![]() |
![]()
i vote no on the v8 but i guess if they were to come out with it, it'll be to compete with the american muscles? I don't know
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Stock
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 10
![]() |
![]()
FYI, the new Nissan GT-R does not have an inline six (I6) block, it's a V6.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Dream Offer | Karma_Supra | MKIV Supra | 22 | 10-17-2007 03:04 PM |
RX7 FD TT (92-01) VS Skyline R32 GT-R (89-92) VS Supra MKIV TT ? | Feel-IX | Non-Generation Specific Questions | 8 | 07-19-2007 02:18 AM |
skyline taillights for my 87 supra | famous | Non-Generation Specific Questions | 2 | 08-14-2006 10:46 AM |
video: highly tuned R34 Skyline and MK4 Supra (on the track) | white2abbit | MKIV Supra | 0 | 02-18-2006 07:37 AM |
R32 Skyline GTR vs 4th Gen Supra | insane_snowman | MKIV Supra | 17 | 12-07-2005 02:49 PM |