me likey!!
i want one, bet it'll cost abit though :(

where would we be if supra's never changed IDIOTS!!!!!
Driving 2.8 litre single cam engines STILL !!!!!
IT'S known as progression in technology DUMBASS'
Supra's have not always been 3.0 litre six's.
2.8 5me,or 5mgeu in mk2 ,2.0 1g gte in mk2 & mk3 or even 2.5 1jz mk3 ?
correct me if im wrong please .
2jz's didn't have vvt either at first, progress and improvement's brought that.
I don't about you knuckle draggers out there but i would love a supra with 4wd to finally be able to take full advantage of the superior power of toyota, and once'n' for all shut up those nissan GTR knobheads!!!
IF THEY SO HAPPEN TO CHANGE THE ENGINE to a 4 or 5 litre V8 ,V10 or V12 that revs to 10,000 rpm and a pair of turbo's on it i say,
BRING IT , LET'S GO NISSAN HUNTING!!!!!!
IF the inline 6 is dropped do you really think it's replacment wont be better??? COME ON ,PLEASE!!!!!!!!!!
:bow::gotnos:

How much do you think it will cost?

yea them pics remind me of infinity g35 and the honda s two kay

But i would rather get these instead hahaha

Supra!
 

Perosnally i belive that the supra should remain in the past. I mean it is an extrodinary car. but they dont need to try and improve on it. and those concept pictures make it look horrible. it looks like a combination of a honda fit and a honda s2000 with a toyota emblem on it

agreed. but still just make the MKIV a little more fuel efficient and bring them back lol my thoughts though i like the MKIII's better. it wouldnt be hard to make a I-6 more efficient look at the new grows looking mustangs v6 35 mpg...

:( I guess I can't disagree completely. It sure seems that the MK5 has nowhere to go but downhill.

Here I can disagree. The Mkiv TT was about an I6 making v8+ horsepower, and upgradeability - not fuel efficiency. Just mho.

lol who needs a v8 when you got that at your finger tips lol.

thay will never be a NEW SUPRA.
 

every thing about the supra from the str8 sick motor to just how the car looks cant be matched. to bring it back with a new style and a..."V" power plant... i cant comment how it makes me fill.

I wonder how much the brake controversy cost resources that would have been spent on new products. It was also a distraction, and it might make the Toyota execs proceed cautiously.

Some of the new concepts are interesting. The FT-86 looks to me, bodywise like a 5th generation Supra.

What in the 'H' do you want a "V power plant" for??? Why not stick with the 1000hp+ capable inline 6? An I6 is synonymous with the brand name Supra, to me.

If BMW can make an I6 TT work, why can't Toyota?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BMW_N54

the body
 

i think they should have kept the 07 body 09 way to round for me :crazy2:

I don't like that it comes in convertible either
Sticking with the targa top option would be cool and different because no one else is still doing it
This Supra has nothing in common with the Supra we know and love except for the name
Advancing technology is all fine and dandy but they haven't built off of the Supra at all
Instead they have come up with a completely new car and called it a Supra :dunno:

gayyyy! they just need to keep the supra fam how it is!

I?m afraid this is the only toyota supra that i?m gonna drive for the moment... :wtc:

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-LBrBZx6GuE...+supra+-11.jpg

Similarites
 

May I say, don't you think that all the rival cars look exactly the same, like the Lexus Sc430 with Infinti G35. The Nissan 350Z has characteristics of the old MkIV Supra. I'm just saying that if a new Supra comes out, and hopefully it does and soon, don't expect any difference in style and to be honest, Toyota's Lexus brand made the LF-A and that model could be a good Supra. If not, Lexus still has a few concepts with the LF- prefix that could be the ultimate Supra. We've seen the FT-86 that's supposed to be the modernisation of the Corolla (with help from Subaru). If Toyota's looking, we're all waiting for a new Supra:crazy2: