new toyota supra 2007

[fuel_girl]

me likey!!
i want one, bet it'll cost abit though

[gteduck]

where would we be if supra's never changed IDIOTS!!!!!
Driving 2.8 litre single cam engines STILL !!!!!
IT'S known as progression in technology DUMBASS'
Supra's have not always been 3.0 litre six's.
2.8 5me,or 5mgeu in mk2 ,2.0 1g gte in mk2 & mk3 or even 2.5 1jz mk3 ?
correct me if im wrong please .
2jz's didn't have vvt either at first, progress and improvement's brought that.
I don't about you knuckle draggers out there but i would love a supra with 4wd to finally be able to take full advantage of the superior power of toyota, and once'n' for all shut up those nissan GTR knobheads!!!
IF THEY SO HAPPEN TO CHANGE THE ENGINE to a 4 or 5 litre V8 ,V10 or V12 that revs to 10,000 rpm and a pair of turbo's on it i say,
BRING IT , LET'S GO NISSAN HUNTING!!!!!!
IF the inline 6 is dropped do you really think it's replacment wont be better??? COME ON ,PLEASE!!!!!!!!!!

[pwpanas]

Originally Posted by fuel_girl

me likey!!
i want one, bet it'll cost abit though

How much do you think it will cost?

[Beasting]

yea them pics remind me of infinity g35 and the honda s two kay

But i would rather get these instead hahaha

[Jponzini]

Perosnally i belive that the supra should remain in the past. I mean it is an extrodinary car. but they dont need to try and improve on it. and those concept pictures make it look horrible. it looks like a combination of a honda fit and a honda s2000 with a toyota emblem on it

[zby67]

Originally Posted by Jponzini

Perosnally i belive that the supra should remain in the past. I mean it is an extrodinary car. but they dont need to try and improve on it. and those concept pictures make it look horrible. it looks like a combination of a honda fit and a honda s2000 with a toyota emblem on it

agreed. but still just make the MKIV a little more fuel efficient and bring them back lol my thoughts though i like the MKIII's better. it wouldnt be hard to make a I-6 more efficient look at the new grows looking mustangs v6 35 mpg...

[pwpanas]

Originally Posted by Jponzini

Perosnally i belive that the supra should remain in the past. I mean it is an extrodinary car. but they dont need to try and improve on it. and those concept pictures make it look horrible. it looks like a combination of a honda fit and a honda s2000 with a toyota emblem on it

I guess I can't disagree completely. It sure seems that the MK5 has nowhere to go but downhill.

[pwpanas]

Originally Posted by zby67

agreed. but still just make the MKIV a little more fuel efficient and bring them back lol my thoughts though i like the MKIII's better. it wouldnt be hard to make a I-6 more efficient look at the new grows looking mustangs v6 35 mpg...

Here I can disagree. The Mkiv TT was about an I6 making v8+ horsepower, and upgradeability - not fuel efficiency. Just mho.

[zby67]

Originally Posted by pwpanas

Here I can disagree. The Mkiv TT was about an I6 making v8+ horsepower, and upgradeability - not fuel efficiency. Just mho.

lol who needs a v8 when you got that at your finger tips lol.