|
![]() |
#1 | |
3" Exhaust
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 221
![]() |
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Supra Owner
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: GA, USA
Posts: 2,209
![]() |
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
3" Exhaust
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 221
![]() |
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
3" Exhaust
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 221
![]() |
![]()
Actually let me do the math on this. A 93-98 tt supra puts out about 320hp stock. The stock boost on the ct26's is usually around 7-11.5(ea). Now the ct26's are much like a conventional t3/t4. The ct26 is capable of putting out 20psi max. Now each psi equals about 7-10hp. If we up the boost from the stock 10psi on each turbo to say 20psi on each turbo thats 40 psi total on a 2jz NA puts out around 240. So take 40multiply that by 10 you get 400hp add the stock motors hp which is 240 and you get around 640hp. The proof is in the math. Of course engine management/fuel management will be needed. But the stock turbos are capable of that mark. Now if I can only find that dam link.
I hope all that made sense. Sorry if that was confusing. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Supra Owner
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: GA, USA
Posts: 2,209
![]() |
![]() Quote:
If you think you can build an Mkiv Supra TT with a bone-stock 2jz-gte and stock twins that will produce 640hp at the crank (a full 544hp at the wheels) then do so and you will be in the record books. Until then, the theoretical maximum for the oem 2jz-gte twin turbos on a normally aspirated (NA) 2jz-ge is irrelevant to Evilfurby's original question. I might also remind you that the 2jz-ge (NA) has higher compression than the 2jz-gte...and that the head is different so the oem twins don't bolt up to the 2jz-ge head. I hope that wasn't confusing. Last edited by pwpanas; 12-30-2005 at 06:53 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
3" Exhaust
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 221
![]() |
![]() Quote:
Btw, I have never heard anyone say "normally aspriated" before. I usually here it as called naturally aspirated. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Supra Owner
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: GA, USA
Posts: 2,209
![]() |
![]() Quote:
...Also you're the one that brought up horsepower figures for an NA (normally/naturally aspirated) 2jz, which has different pistions in the bottom end than the 2jz-gte that comes with the '97 Mkiv TT. Lastly, I sincerely doubt Evilfuby was talking about buying a '97 Mkiv TT for 20K, and then spending another $15K on headwork (and even with $15K of headwork and cams you STILL won't get 650rwhp out of the stock twins)... LOL! ![]() Last edited by pwpanas; 12-29-2005 at 07:22 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Boost and Stock Fuel | collink | MKIII Supra | 5 | 03-26-2008 11:43 PM |
1986.5 STOCK SWAP TO A SHORT BLOCK | DarkRaiderz | MKIII Supra | 2 | 06-20-2005 11:59 PM |