WHICH IS BETTER 3000GT OR MKiii

[Black'88]

Originally Posted by KhanArtisT

Once again...you can't be serious.




Uh...

What exactly are you trying to prove? In my opinion, the supra looks better in both pictures. Which then comes to show that 3/S vs mk3 supra is purely down to personal opinion. They both may or may not be appealing to a certain person and they can both be fast.

And what are you complaining about the hostility for? What do you expect coming to a supra owners forum and going on about how stealth/3kgt are OBVIOUSLY faster/better looking that mk3 like it's supposedly common knowledge?

I find it quite funny that you're arguing with a guy with a 667rwhp sup about how theyre not quite in the same 'class' that the 3kgt/stealth are supposedly in.

[Supra2NR]

YES supra2nr a supra can beat a corvette... wtf? since when are vette's almighty? maybe a challenge is a c6 z06...

yes that is what i meant those type of vettes
chicago still isnt anywhere close to the two coasts when it comes to racing

basically there's two types of obvious racers here
you got the poor that pours blood, sweat, and tears to thier cars
(mostly hatchback civics, nissans, old rx7's, mitsubitshi's)
these are the pple that i race with, we down here dont really have that much to show for cars except the time that we put in it

then you got , the rich pple that has money pouring out of thier pockets
benzes, bmw's, new rx7's, tt supras, evo's, even saw a couple of skylines in there
those are the pple that i hate, pple that jus jump into racing, and dont know shit
those kids that drive thier daddy's car like they bought themselves

dont get me wrong i bet i can find a civic that will kill a vette
but those two worlds barely clash, without something horrible happening
cus the last time i saw them race
it was a idk what year hatch civic, vs a 03 supercharged mustang
the kid raced for slips, and when he lost he tried driving away
all i heard was sum gunshots, and police sirens after that
thats why i jus wanna know how supras do with vette's
it sparks interest in me

Originally Posted by Supra2NR
i said vette


i dont care about " the vette "

and burton sorry bout that jus a little confusion

And what are you complaining about the hostility for? What do you expect coming to a supra owners forum and going on about how stealth/3kgt are OBVIOUSLY faster/better looking that mk3 like it's supposedly common knowledge?

best post i have seen, and exactly how i feel
how would you like it if sumbody comes to your house and calls your daughter slow, and ugly?

[tone loc]

word, i worked two of my childhood summers mowin laws and slaving over a hot grill to by my supra and nothing means more to me right now.

[Supra2NR]

word, i worked two of my childhood summers mowin laws and slaving over a hot grill to by my supra and nothing means more to me right now.

see this how we do in the chi
like me
i dont even remember the last time i bought clothes for myself
basically the order for goes like this

the supra
my girl
then me

[Isphius]

Ill porbably get yelled at for this, But the 3000gt came from a different era of design than the mk3. It was also designed by americans (chrysler corp), same as the 12t adn 2nd gen eclipse/talon/laser. But it would be more accurate to compare a mk3 to a mitsubishi starion. They were made to compete. As for the vr4/stelth RT, Def vs a mk4 TT. As for the looks, I would say a mk3 or 4 definatley looks a lot better IMO. The 3000gt style cars are just plain old ugly. Esepcially the dashboard, Not to mention there is NO room in the cockpit. And i was just in one not that long ago, A 95 n/a, So im speaking from first hand experience. Just my opinion/s...

[KhanArtisT]

Originally Posted by Supra2NR

yes that is what i meant those type of vettes
chicago still isnt anywhere close to the two coasts when it comes to racing

basically there's two types of obvious racers here
you got the poor that pours blood, sweat, and tears to thier cars
(mostly hatchback civics, nissans, old rx7's, mitsubitshi's)
these are the pple that i race with, we down here dont really have that much to show for cars except the time that we put in it

then you got , the rich pple that has money pouring out of thier pockets
benzes, bmw's, new rx7's, tt supras, evo's, even saw a couple of skylines in there
those are the pple that i hate, pple that jus jump into racing, and dont know shit
those kids that drive thier daddy's car like they bought themselves

dont get me wrong i bet i can find a civic that will kill a vette
but those two worlds barely clash, without something horrible happening
cus the last time i saw them race
it was a idk what year hatch civic, vs a 03 supercharged mustang
the kid raced for slips, and when he lost he tried driving away
all i heard was sum gunshots, and police sirens after that
thats why i jus wanna know how supras do with vette's
it sparks interest in me


and burton sorry bout that jus a little confusion



best post i have seen, and exactly how i feel
how would you like it if sumbody comes to your house and calls your daughter slow, and ugly?

You can drive an EVO/Sti or whatever if you want, I have many friends making monthly payments on them and modding them little by little working at Merchants, or small shops like that. I simply prefer older sports cars vs. newer cars that I see all the time or that are "hyped" a lot. AKA OMFG MM331! STI! EVO! It makes going to meets very boring for me since you see the same cars over and over. And uh, yes theres rich kids that drive more expensive cars but you'd most likely be able to beat them just because of the fact that they usually don't know how to drive for shit, or the cars are automatics. There are rich car enthusiasts though, someone on 3SI drives a 96 Stealth Twin turbo that runs low 10s, and daily drives an FD. This isn't really the best hobby, and thats one of the worst parts of it that you can do whatever you want to your car, but money will always hold you back and someone with the same amount of knowledge that has more money will have the better car.

And I don't have a daughter so I can't answer your question. But yes if someone made a comment about my car that was true and not exxagerated (honest criticism) I would agree with them...

[suprra_girl]

well.. what a thread!

i got thru the second page and got bored of the high school bickering

KhanArtisT: do you own a supra?

if no... then you have no right to say that a mk3 is worse or better till you own one therefore = no bashing rights, if you would like to continue bashing the mk3 i will kindly ban you for that

if i find one more comment bashing the mk3 supra in any way that will be your ban comment, no exceptions. So think carefully of what you write.

This is a supra forum, particularly we are in the mk3 forum, so if you don't like mk3's or have some bs comment to make... what do the elite keyboard warrior computer geeks say..... GTFO

This thread is locked, if you would like to continue your high school bickering please do it via pm, but also bear in mind that if i hear from anyone with regards to your pm's being overly rude etc that will also be a ban

This forum is generally an extremely relaxing environment and like-supra owners can chat amongst themselves and help out newbies.

I will not tolerate any flamewars anymore!
as soon as i see one starting they will be locked.

Also, swearing will not be tolerated if it is made in an unpleasant manner or being disrespectful to others

Thank you all for your cooperation and if this thread is remade it will be deleted immediately



EDIT: so he thought it'd be fun to pm me

KhanArtisT says: "KhanArtisT: do you own a supra?

if no... then you have no right to say that a mk3 is worse or better till you own one therefore = no bashing rights, if you would like to continue bashing the mk3 i will kindly ban you for that "

...What I was saying was facts, not opinions. Slow= high 14s/ 91-93mph, a trap achievable by a stock NA 3S, ugly = dated/unoriginal/trendy styling, and bad handling = 3500lbs and um...

I think its quite funny that you're telling me I have no right to do that when kwante first stated that my car was a "piece". He sure as hell doesn't own one, when I have a friend (Slater, look at his sig) who I hang with almost every day and I have driven, raced, and worked on his 87 Turbo. Not to mention that I actually gave honest criticism, also stating the reason I like the MKIII...

Now that I think about it...thats actually quite sad, along with the fact that you, like everyone else in that thread got so pussy hurt that you carelessly overlooked my personal racial attack towards Supra2NR, which if I was a mod, would be a good reason to ban or suspend someone. I guess this is what happens when the forum is run by a female moderator I think you should go buy a beetle or a sunfire so you can look "cute" in it mkay?

I guess now you can do your thing and give that last message and ban me right away because you don't want to hear what I would say back

-Adnan

i said: well guess what, i'm cute and own a powerful supra

ban stick!


lmfao

[KhanArtisT]

Originally Posted by Black'88

What exactly are you trying to prove? In my opinion, the supra looks better in both pictures. Which then comes to show that 3/S vs mk3 supra is purely down to personal opinion. They both may or may not be appealing to a certain person and they can both be fast.

And what are you complaining about the hostility for? What do you expect coming to a supra owners forum and going on about how stealth/3kgt are OBVIOUSLY faster/better looking that mk3 like it's supposedly common knowledge?

I find it quite funny that you're arguing with a guy with a 667rwhp sup about how theyre not quite in the same 'class' that the 3kgt/stealth are supposedly in.

Uh, yeah. Opinion, right Well, I'm pretty realistic about my car when I compare it to others, meaning I don't bitch and cry like some people here when my car is compared to another. The MKIII bone stock is ugly, slow, and handles like shit. Thats not my opinion, its just fact. They're rare and can be made fast just like any other boosted 3.0 liter, and thats why I like them.

I don't see how that'd be funny but I already think you're quite wierd seeing as how you think an MKIII looks better than a 3S so it makes sense...

[Isphius]

Originally Posted by KhanArtisT

Uh, yeah. Opinion, right Well, I'm pretty realistic about my car when I compare it to others, meaning I don't bitch and cry like some people here when my car is compared to another. The MKIII bone stock is ugly, slow, and handles like shit. Thats not my opinion, its just fact. They're rare and can be made fast just like any other boosted 3.0 liter, and thats why I like them.

I don't see how that'd be funny but I already think you're quite wierd seeing as how you think an MKIII looks better than a 3S so it makes sense...

I dont know if you realize it but you ARE arguing your own opinion SO of course its gona be better, because its yours. Why are you even on here if the mk3 is ugly, slow and handles like shit? of course people are going to complain about it when your on a dam SUPRA forum. I say if you think the 3g is better, thats your opinion, great. Stop arguing about it. This forum isnt here to compare mk3s to other cars or whatnot. Sure it comes up every once in a while anyway. Its to share info and any other supra related media, And to help others with their mk3s.

[KhanArtisT]

Originally Posted by Isphius

I dont know if you realize it but you ARE arguing your own opinion SO of course its gona be better, because its yours. Why are you even on here if the mk3 is ugly, slow and handles like shit? of course people are going to complain about it when your on a dam SUPRA forum. I say if you think the 3g is better, thats your opinion, great. Stop arguing about it. This forum isnt here to compare mk3s to other cars or whatnot. Sure it comes up every once in a while anyway. Its to share info and any other supra related media, And to help others with their mk3s.

LOL, I have no reason to like my shitbox Stealth. I have a 90 RX7 GXL now and am wanting to get rid of the Stealth very badly. It has been the biggest shitbox in the year that I've owned it. I don't even know what to say about your next question...seems like you were so pussy hurt after reading my post that you totally overlooked my statement about the reason why I like the MKIII in my previous post, and another post in this thread. Please read my previous post and look for it...I don't need you to tell me random obvious things like "this forum isn't here to compared MKIIIs to other cars" when I'm fully aware of that. The reason this is being discussed is the question the thread starter asked. If you look up on the thread title you'll see that he is asking which one is better.

I do find it funny though how worked up you guys are getting when this really doesn't even matter since the thread starter is apparently a complete retard who doesn't seem to know shit about cars. You really can't take anyone seriously when they make a thread titled 'WHICH IS BETTER 3000GT OR MKiii"

I'm still stuck on why he purposely used lower case I's in the MKIII