WHICH IS BETTER 3000GT OR MKiii

[kwnate]

Who said anything about the same mods?

Stock vs Stock, vr4 wins

Same mods vr4 wins

My car vs. your piece, supra wins.

Not that hard

[KhanArtisT]

HAHA. Sorry, I thought an MKIII Supra owner would be the last type of owner calling a Stealth a "piece", LOL. Look at your interior and look at a 3S's. Look at your car and look at a 3S, sorry but "piece" isn't really the right word. Its common sense that by "modded" he would mean the same mods unless hes specified that one car has more.

[ravenmaster]

/me slaps forehead. How retarded. No offense guys but does it really make a diffrence I mean after all we are all part of the car modding world. We are here to help one another not badger eachother. So both of you shut the hell up not. Neither of you is better than the other. And Mr Stealth guy. If you are a stealth modder go hang out in the stealth forums. This is a supra forum.

[KhanArtisT]

Originally Posted by ravenmaster

/me slaps forehead. How retarded. No offense guys but does it really make a diffrence I mean after all we are all part of the car modding world. We are here to help one another not badger eachother. So both of you shut the hell up not. Neither of you is better than the other. And Mr Stealth guy. If you are a stealth modder go hang out in the stealth forums. This is a supra forum.

Aw, this was a rly rly nice post

dude, you're slapping yourself in the head. You're calling us retarded? This is a Supra forum, and the topic is about a 3S. Please use better vocabulary ("stealth modder") and you might just get taken seriously. LOL

[marc]

#1 wtf is a 3S? #2 im pretty sure u wont find a 1990 vr4 seeign as tahts around the year we r comparing the "almighty" vr4 too. if u want to take ur year car..lets say a 1994 vr4. then we would pin it up against our 94 model. a supra tt. hmm now lets see
im pretty sure our 94 supra tt wuld win. bothe being compl stock or heavily modded the same extent. and 3g's r so ugly. hey u 3000gt nice square ass. k bye

[KhanArtisT]

Originally Posted by marc

#1 wtf is a 3S? #2 im pretty sure u wont find a 1990 vr4 seeign as tahts around the year we r comparing the "almighty" vr4 too. if u want to take ur year car..lets say a 1994 vr4. then we would pin it up against our 94 model. a supra tt. hmm now lets see
im pretty sure our 94 supra tt wuld win. bothe being compl stock or heavily modded the same extent. and 3g's r so ugly. hey u 3000gt nice square ass. k bye

Dude...you had to be joking when you said this. You sound like my 13 year old sister when shes trying to make fun of someone. I won't believe you if you said you were serious...I simply have no explanation for this behavior coming from someone whose old enough to drive.

And if you're basically comparing Toyota to Mitsu I would obviously go for the MKIV Supra simply becuase of power + handling vs. (eh) power + no handling. The threadstarter is comparing MKIIIs to VR4s/Stealths.

The VR4 is not really "almighty"...a lot of members on 3SI have projects that had just went to shit because they would rebuild a motor and spin a bearing in 5000 miles, or go from NA to TT and spin a bearing...not to mention the cars handle like ass. Obviously now if you want to go fast only in a straight line you're better off getting a 5.0 or T/A unless you're really into the cars...

3S = 3000GT/Stealth.
3SI = 3000GT/Stealth International = 3SI/org, the message board.

Once again...you can't be serious.




Uh...




Not like I'm making fun of the cars...damn. I like them just becuase no one knows what the hell they are. Rather drive that than some swapped Honda I see 10 times a day...

[burton51m]

Originally Posted by KhanArtisT

Once again...you can't be serious.




Uh...




Not like I'm making fun of the cars...damn.

once again you're comparing a car in the year 1986/1987 to a car in the mid '90's...of course the stealth is gonna look more appealing to some people driving down the road and in the cockpit. newer technology.... take the mid 1990 supra vs the mid 1990 stealth and see what you get as in looks wise. the supra looks a lot better i know.


i also believe the threadstarter was interested in mkiii's or 3000gts, NOT stealths.

[Black'88]

Originally Posted by KhanArtisT

Once again...you can't be serious.




Uh...

What exactly are you trying to prove? In my opinion, the supra looks better in both pictures. Which then comes to show that 3/S vs mk3 supra is purely down to personal opinion. They both may or may not be appealing to a certain person and they can both be fast.

And what are you complaining about the hostility for? What do you expect coming to a supra owners forum and going on about how stealth/3kgt are OBVIOUSLY faster/better looking that mk3 like it's supposedly common knowledge?

I find it quite funny that you're arguing with a guy with a 667rwhp sup about how theyre not quite in the same 'class' that the 3kgt/stealth are supposedly in.

[ravenmaster]

Originally Posted by KhanArtisT

Aw, this was a rly rly nice post

dude, you're slapping yourself in the head. You're calling us retarded? This is a Supra forum, and the topic is about a 3S. Please use better vocabulary ("stealth modder") and you might just get taken seriously. LOL

Sorry I only have about two years speaking and writing english, I am actually German so forgive the mistakes. It's not that I think that you are retarded I think the arguement was. Much apologies.