![]() |
#6 |
walbro fp
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: spokane
Posts: 479
![]() |
![]()
for 650 i dont think its a bad deal. parts are worth a bit so thats a plus. and correct my if im wrong, but isnt the idea to create as much power as possible with the least amount of boost?
i agree the pistons will probably go south fairly quickly, but a high compression (ima guess close to my static compression ratio: 9.58:1 or a lil lower somewhere) low boost setup could potentially have more power. the 7m platform has been gone through like this before and yes, the results were....unfortunate. but i believe it could be done right, ppl have been building small block chevys, hondas etc like this for years. but not by someone willing to get rid of it so cheap. in my mind.
__________________
87 toyota 4x4 single cab short box pickup, 7MGZE. |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1990 Supra Turbo -Any Good!!? | ukferrari | MKIII Supra | 3 | 12-13-2009 09:13 PM |
what do you think of this setup? | Jareduhhhh | MKIV Supra | 4 | 02-19-2009 10:38 AM |
Sequential Turbo Question | suprapoweredsoarer | MKIV Supra | 1 | 06-06-2006 12:13 AM |