what is the best supra

[jza80 Supra C-I TT]

u hit 6th gear at 60 mph? r u okay bro? were u drinking? just imagine him accelerate!! haha! i would walk faster then ever. SUPERSUPRA U SPELLED SUPRA WRONG IN A SUPRA FORUM!!! we should kick make fun of and ban u for the rest of your life and keep u from look at a supra... its horrible. its unthinkable. i cant believe it... ( :lol: ) whats so good about having a wider and heavier car? does it have more pros than cons? (dont u guys think the mkiii kinda sorta looks like the old ferrari's in the front?)

[monkihead]

Originally posted by jza80 Supra C-I TT@May 23 2005, 08:02 PM
u hit 6th gear at 60 mph? r u okay bro? were u drinking? just imagine him accelerate!! haha! i would walk faster then ever. SUPERSUPRA U SPELLED SUPRA WRONG IN A SUPRA FORUM!!! we should kick make fun of and ban u for the rest of your life and keep u from look at a supra... its horrible. its unthinkable. i cant believe it... ( :lol: ) whats so good about having a wider and heavier car? does it have more pros than cons? (dont u guys think the mkiii kinda sorta looks like the old ferrari's in the front?)

i drink all the time. esspecially when im drunk :blink: wider gives better ground control as long as the car isnt too tall. heavier makes for a smoother ride on high speeds. the tib got scary between 130-140mph.

[midwestmk2]

Ive driven all of them except the MK1.. To me i dont much care for the handling or acceleration of the newer ones..I guess its just the turbo setups.. I currently own a 83MK2 and i have left every MK3,and4 at the lights ive pulled up to and im naturally assperated..sure they caught me buy 3rd gear(only170hp)..Stock engine just a few mods.. Next summer im going to order a crate from the "chimp" ..Race prepped head and block with 11;01 compression..Can you say torque monster!! :blink: Hopfully i should get atleast 250 to 300 out of that set up.. Maybe a 50 to 100 shot of NOS..I dont know..The MK2 seems to corner alot better than the others also.. Plus i want to see you get a MK3 or 4 down to 2500lbs and still be completly street leagal and have stock body parts wth interior..That means no carbon or glass.. If i do that then we are talking 2100 to 2200 or less,easy.. Thats a nice power to weight ratio,Naturally assperated..! B) But its all in the eye of the beholder.. Your choice as long as its a SUPRA!! :P

[KingDiamond]

I must say myself its hard to choose between the MK3 and MK2, but i do agree to me the mk2 handles better.

[Aboyandhiscar]

The only Ferrari that a Supra could beat is one without an engine.

[monkihead]

Originally posted by Aboyandhiscar@Jul 3 2005, 11:35 AM
The only Ferrari that a Supra could beat is one without an engine.

uh,no.

[KingDiamond]

This person is very confused.

if mkIII was better than a '06 or a mkIV then kerry would be president.........that makes no sense but.......oh well who cares!!.................the only TRUE thing is mkIV or mkV definetely whup mkIII.... B)

[QUOTE]Aboyandhiscar: The only Ferrari that a Supra could beat is one without an engine.



ok...........that is THE dumbest thing i ever heard he shound'nt even be talking ....in the redline movie a supra whup'd the crap out a of a ferrari 355 spyder and in another movie a lamborgini Gallardo....SAME SUPRA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

oh yea.....i forgot to tell u my friend in chicago has a corvette c6, a 800 hp mkIV, and a ferrari modina.......and his mkIV has whup'd all of them....my other friend in chicago hac a whoppin 1016 hp mkIV and whups everything in sight.........and my cousin in chicago has a mkIV with every visual upgrade possible on it and a whoppin 750 hp or somethin like that on it............and all of them were bought as stock single turbo mkIV's....is my life awesome or wat i get to freakin ride in em whenever i go over there........