WHICH IS BETTER 3000GT OR MKiii

[mrnickleye]

Originally Posted by marc

ok lets review waht this idiot just said...if u have lots of money and want to go fast..a supra inst for u..hmm ok moron for 1 a supra turbo is fats newer older, they r fast. 2nd of all u said if u have money. a supra can beat a ferarri f50 if u have enough money into it u idiot.

As I said to kwnate......

Like I said, I love my car, and plan on keeping it for a very long time. Its a pleasure to drive.

But, as you may have (or not) noticed, I NEVER have to swear, or call anyone an idiot. Those ways of communication speak "volumes" about the knowledge, age, and experience of the speaker.

I just have lots of car experience....40 years to be precise.

And I have lots of experience researching the facts, too.

And....we are talking about MKIIIs, not MKIVs.

MKIIIs vs

F50 Ferrari ??
Specs (The 4.7litre V12 engine was tuned to generate around 750bhp, stock)
Engine type: 4.7 L (4699 cc/286 in?) V12
Bore: 85 mm (3.30 in)
Stroke: 69 mm (2.72 in)
Power: 513 hp (383 kW) at 8500 rpm
Torque: 347 ft·lbf (470 N·m) at 6500 rpm
Wheelbase: 2581 mm (101.6 in)
Length: 4481 mm (176.4 in)
Height: 1120 mm (44.1 in)
Width: 1986 mm (78.2 in)
Curb weight: 1229 kg (2710 lb)
Top speed: 325 km/h (202 mph)
0-60 mph (97 km/h): 3.7 s
1-100 mph (161 km/h): 7.2 s
1/4 mile: 11.1 s

And the mods we are discussing are HP increase mods, so 1/4 mile times are very relevant to HP mods.

Your followup post was...."sry about bein in a bad mood just got out of work and the boss was an a-hole do not mean to be offensive"........

I don't get offended. I know what I know.

And...I don't even like the 3kgt...its a pain to get in & out of.

But I would have the F50 because it 'looks' so kool.