WHICH IS BETTER 3000GT OR MKiii

[KhanArtisT]

Originally Posted by marc

#1 wtf is a 3S? #2 im pretty sure u wont find a 1990 vr4 seeign as tahts around the year we r comparing the "almighty" vr4 too. if u want to take ur year car..lets say a 1994 vr4. then we would pin it up against our 94 model. a supra tt. hmm now lets see
im pretty sure our 94 supra tt wuld win. bothe being compl stock or heavily modded the same extent. and 3g's r so ugly. hey u 3000gt nice square ass. k bye

Dude...you had to be joking when you said this. You sound like my 13 year old sister when shes trying to make fun of someone. I won't believe you if you said you were serious...I simply have no explanation for this behavior coming from someone whose old enough to drive.

And if you're basically comparing Toyota to Mitsu I would obviously go for the MKIV Supra simply becuase of power + handling vs. (eh) power + no handling. The threadstarter is comparing MKIIIs to VR4s/Stealths.

The VR4 is not really "almighty"...a lot of members on 3SI have projects that had just went to shit because they would rebuild a motor and spin a bearing in 5000 miles, or go from NA to TT and spin a bearing...not to mention the cars handle like ass. Obviously now if you want to go fast only in a straight line you're better off getting a 5.0 or T/A unless you're really into the cars...

3S = 3000GT/Stealth.
3SI = 3000GT/Stealth International = 3SI/org, the message board.

Once again...you can't be serious.




Uh...




Not like I'm making fun of the cars...damn. I like them just becuase no one knows what the hell they are. Rather drive that than some swapped Honda I see 10 times a day...