|
![]() |
#1 | |
3" Exhaust
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: texas
Posts: 105
![]() |
![]() Quote:
Sorry it took me so long to reply I wasn't notified that someone posted. That's funney iv heard the opposite everywhere iv been. On a turbo cxar biger is better to allow the exhaus to escape faster and to alow scavenging to occure in the piping. The more free your downpipe and exhaust is the faster your spool is because there is leas back preasure. The faster you can spool up the quicker you get your power. I have also been told that you can see gains of 1-3 psi and 30+ horsepower just from a 3" high flow exhaust. Someone correct me if I'm wrong please
__________________
Cars: 1995 NIssan altima with 2 year old pant on black Drag DR-8 17x7 Wheels with brand new Goodyear Eagle GT's Custom Blue Parking lights with White silverstar head lights JDM Ebay Catback Exhaust. K&N air filter. (Totaled Due To An Idiot) bone stock (for now) 1990 Supra Turbo With a brand new CT-26 Turbo And New Exhaust Manifold. Now With A Brand New Blown Head Gasket ![]() Now driving a 99 Nissan Maxima 5spd with the passanger side bashed in from passing out at the wheel nice cars ehh?? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
3" Exhaust
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 225
![]() |
![]()
I don't know if your wrong or right.. I hope it is true.. Sounds true enough..
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
![]() Toyota Racing Development Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 5,038
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]()
Ok... well, yes and no... Larger pipe HURTS scavenging... severely. The larger the pipe the lower the velocity and the more time gases have to cool and increase in density thus requiring more energy be expended to expel them. BUT, scavenging isn't terribly important in a forced induction setup.... it is fo a N/A application which is why you'll hear a lot of mechanics and tuners telling an N/A owner they're a dope for running a 3" or larger exhaust, too large a throttle body or intake piping. Scavenging is a where the high velocity of the gasses flowing through the exhaust create a suction which, if employed correctly, assists in the removal of exhaust gases from the combustion chamber on the exhaust stroke... in a turbo setup this simply is not possible as the gasses must be pushed in order to move the exducer. The turbo's exhaust, especially after the turbo, is much cooler and much denser thus it requires more room to flow without creating back pressure.... and no matter what you may have heard; BACK PRESSURE IS NEVER A GOOD THING!
__________________
If something breaks or you need to contact a member of the administration please post HERE. Unless it's a private or administration matter please post it on the forum. It benefits no one else if car related questions aren't posted for future users and takes away from the time I'm able to spend helping on the rest of the forum. If you're so inclined I'm always more than happy to accept tips via PayPal. ![]() Tip Jar ---> ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
3" Exhaust
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 225
![]() |
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Stock
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 10
![]() |
![]()
Sorry you are wrong, the size of the pipe after the turbo on a STREET driven car is very important The flange on the turbo back to the under the car (First 1.5 /2 meter) is very important and dispite what you have read, i have proven it many times on the dyno but in fairness as the engine gets larger the effect is less, I stand by my comment that most people buy things that dont suit what there are doing but thats the power of advertizing (God bless America) LoL Phil
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
3" Exhaust
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: raleigh
Posts: 138
![]() |
![]()
Ive got a 3inch downpipe if you need one
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Stock
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 10
![]() |
![]()
Sure your right but thats is all I'm doing, Im sure members can take from it what they will Thanks Phil
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
3" Exhaust
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Camp Lejeune
Posts: 59
![]() |
![]()
from some personal experiences My friend took his stock 1j and put a nice 3" exhaust on it and he definitley saw hp gains and boosted from 12psi to 15psi hitting cut somewhere now and it sounds very nice and spool is very smooth and fast. I would recommend a 3" exhaust For any inline 6 as to be Perfect i think a 3.5 is to big.. but i have yet to drive with one to compare.. 2.5 seems a tiny bit to small for my needs and hp wants
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Stock
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 10
![]() |
![]()
From personal experiance, my mate ??? did he try a 2.5 system? no, so HOW can you make this statment, he may well of got the same result and what sort of expert are you to advise people to fit a 3 " system? I know a guy who had a freind who knew a guy ........
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
3" Exhaust
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Camp Lejeune
Posts: 59
![]() |
![]()
i drove the car. im not saying 2.5 is bad but he say hp gains to the 3"
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1990 Supra Turbo -Any Good!!? | ukferrari | MKIII Supra | 3 | 12-13-2009 09:13 PM |
Toyota Supra -95 Non turbo upgrade! | Supraboy_ | MKIV Supra | 3 | 01-08-2006 01:00 AM |