|
![]() |
#1 | |
Intake
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Pretoria, South Africa
Posts: 39
![]() |
![]() Quote:
![]() ![]() Take a look at this technical article: www.mkiv.co.nz (check under technical section. A wealth of information on the Supra helped me a great deal. I'm also in the market for one - I desperately want/need it ![]() I found great deals in it's homeland of Japan so, I'll be getting a JDM spec - oh yeah! The w58 N/A tranny is capable of 260rwkw (I think that's 360HP) whilst the TT's auto A340E is capable of more at 350rwkw (+-470HP) and the king V160 6 speed TT tranny is capable of a whopping 500rwkw + (750HP)!!! Definitely the one to go for if you're running that power. N/A is great and very affordable. However, the Twin Turbo is the undisputed king and ultimate Supra MKIV - if you could possibly afford one, please buy it. If you really cannot, set up a careful budget for your N/A Turbo conversion - if done well, the 2JZ-GE can produce massive power as well. It's just much more costly of course. As for differences between the two, the article will have you covered there. Suspension wise, the TT came with Bilstein shocks, better ABS system, traction control as standard, spoiler control. Since you will be buying an export spec in the UK, the brakes are bigger than the N/A's. If you're buying from Japan, 93 - 95 Supras had the same size brakes for both TT and N/A. If you're pushing much more power than standard, upgrading them is a good idea with bigger rotors or at least slotted ones with better pads to match. If not, the Supra's original brakes (TT, especially) are very, very good in road or track scenarios. Best of luck bro! Keep us posted... |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Supra Owner
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: GA, USA
Posts: 2,209
![]() |
![]()
Actually the V160 has survived on the dyno at well beyond 1,500rwhp. It's an amazing piece of engineering.
__________________
Phil '94 Supra Turbo, 6spd, 'APU'+ Displacement is no replacement for boost. Life begins at 30psi. NB: Please consider posting any help requests in a new thread instead of asking me for help privately. About 99.9+% of the time, private help requests end up covering great information that could be very valuable to other forum members. If you have a good reason for needing the help request to be private, I'll consider it. If not, then why not give everyone else the opportunity to pitch in too, and/or learn from the information? Remember, there's no such thing as a dumb question. We're all here to help within this family of Supra owners. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Intake
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Pretoria, South Africa
Posts: 39
![]() |
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Supra Owner
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: GA, USA
Posts: 2,209
![]() |
![]() Quote:
No V160 has ever failed at anywhere near only 750rwhp, except the 2nd gear synchro from abusive power shifting.
__________________
Phil '94 Supra Turbo, 6spd, 'APU'+ Displacement is no replacement for boost. Life begins at 30psi. NB: Please consider posting any help requests in a new thread instead of asking me for help privately. About 99.9+% of the time, private help requests end up covering great information that could be very valuable to other forum members. If you have a good reason for needing the help request to be private, I'll consider it. If not, then why not give everyone else the opportunity to pitch in too, and/or learn from the information? Remember, there's no such thing as a dumb question. We're all here to help within this family of Supra owners. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Intake
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Pretoria, South Africa
Posts: 39
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
6 speed Transmission? | Killa B | Non-Generation Specific Questions | 1 | 02-21-2011 06:43 PM |