|
|
06-30-2007, 04:54 PM
|
#1 |
|
Stock
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: PORTUGAL
Posts: 6
 |
civic vs supra..
hello!I own a civic 93 with a swaped motor to 1.6 and the usual bolts'on it make 154cv that is pritty good for a egg,but i'm done with ff cars i want a SUPRA!!!
I frend of mine is rebuilding one that is for sale,it's a7m n/a engine totaly restored with all new internals and i'm realy thinking in purchasing it!?! I know that YOU are suspicious to tell me how good is the car but i want some feed back of supras mk3 n/a owners! I haven't ride the "beast" yet because it isn't reddy now! is it faster then my civic? does the 200cv stock can push well all that weight? i love the fact that its TARGA! |
|
|
|
06-30-2007, 05:37 PM
|
#2 |
|
Stock
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: PORTUGAL
Posts: 6
|
is some body out there?
|
|
|
|
|
06-30-2007, 05:49 PM
|
#3 | |
|
3" Exhaust
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 214
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
06-30-2007, 06:10 PM
|
#4 |
|
20psi boost
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 706
|
n/a are nice and having a targa is a +. (wish i had one) but the n/a cant really that much more hp compared to the 7mgte(turbo).
|
|
|
|
|
06-30-2007, 06:25 PM
|
#5 |
 Toyota Racing Development Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 5,038
 |
He did post in English... look where he's from. Try to be a little forgiving.
The N/A is a fairly quick ride, but the Civic would probably beat it easily from a dead stop. Get the car rolling and I'd probably favor the N/A Supra over an older Civic. Yes, the car is heavy... Very heavy. It's got enough power once the car is moving, but don't expect it to be a race car when it's still all stock. |
|
|
|
|
07-01-2007, 01:48 AM
|
#6 |
|
3" Exhaust
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: bvjhgfh
Posts: 97
|
I have owned an na since october and liked it somewhat at first. I liked the prestige of the car, but after a little bit i realized just how slow it was. Thats why i bought a turbo on the 19'th of this month. All i have to say it go turbo or go home. I have not drivin a stock turbo but i can say that my slightly modded turbo is sooo much better.
If your looking for speed just wait and get a turbo because you will be disappointed with an NA. Random specs of my NA 1/4 mile time 15.89 at 87 with a 2.37 60 foot. 0-60 in 8.4 sec |
|
|
|
|
07-01-2007, 02:20 AM
|
#7 | |
|
3" Exhaust
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Long Beach, CA
Posts: 224
|
i say get it! then swap it out for a 7mgte or 1jzgte. a targa top is hard to pass up, you'll turn heads with it off
__________________
89 white package twin turbo Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
07-01-2007, 08:37 AM
|
#8 |
|
12psi boost
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: long beach, CA
Posts: 252
|
damn that nice so he rebuilt the N/A engine did he prep the head gasket right and if you end up buying it make sure he does prep it right or you will end up redoing it....I have a targa and it owns buh body flexes alot you can fix it by stiffing up the frame though....The car is heavey as hell trust me i have a Turbo and it still feels heavey
__________________
88turbo targa-white original Pin Stripe custom intake-Tenzo filter.....Momo racing seats and steering wheel... apexi exhaust tip-custom 3" piping. Replaced with RSR GT II NGK plug and wires HID conversion head lights HKS Turbo Timer Type-1 (in black) Tial BOV BIC DDP |
|
|
|
|
07-01-2007, 03:15 PM
|
#9 | |
|
3" Exhaust
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 214
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
07-01-2007, 04:24 PM
|
#10 |
|
Stock
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: PORTUGAL
Posts: 6
|
no problem dude!!! lol
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| HELP PLEASE | Nick0887 | Non-Generation Specific Questions | 4 | 02-28-2009 07:26 AM |
| Questions about MKIV Supra | ukno0003 | MKIV Supra | 5 | 11-06-2008 10:53 AM |
| Dream Offer | Karma_Supra | MKIV Supra | 22 | 10-17-2007 03:04 PM |
| Supra VS Civic | dragokatzov | Non-Generation Specific Questions | 3 | 03-01-2005 05:01 AM |
Hybrid Mode
