06-22-2013, 10:27 AM
|
#5 |
|
Stock
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Pontefrac
Posts: 24
 |
Ah okay, thought you were going turbo sorry. I think that taking a few though shouldn't be a problem , however, there is always one isn't there, the MK3 is a non interference engine but I am thinking that take too much off it could become an interference engine, make sure the company that is doing the shaving can tell you if the valves will interfere, hit the pistons, just incase the timing belt breaks.
__________________
Bored old git that loves his toyota's I have two one a Supra MK3 with a targa top the other is a brit Camry V6. 
|
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Re-torque head gasket from 56 ft./lb. to 75 ft./lb. (Good idea or bad idea) | Randy0223 | MKIII Supra | 4 | 04-23-2011 09:50 PM |
| Blown Head Gasket? | BillW | MKIII Supra | 5 | 09-17-2010 02:06 AM |
| Head skim requirement? | MA70-3.0GT | MKIII Supra | 11 | 12-15-2009 06:03 PM |
| replacing the head and headgasket | skadaloz | MKIII Supra | 4 | 04-13-2009 11:54 PM |
| Fel-Pro Head Gasket for Stock 1990 Turbo Engine | Benesesso | MKIII Supra | 5 | 03-10-2006 10:52 PM |
Threaded Mode