|
|
08-11-2008, 01:52 AM
|
#1 |
|
Lexus & 550's
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Illinois
Posts: 521
 |
like chambers said, it all depends on how much money you are willing to dish out. supra's are a money pit because everything is expensive, unlike the honda
__________________
91 N/A automatic supra;K&N FIPK;2.5" custom exhaust;no cat;pacesetter header;eibach springs;tokico "blues";MKIV TT rims |
|
|
|
08-11-2008, 05:22 AM
|
#2 |
|
Stock
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: CA
Posts: 3
|
I still don't understand what's so bad about having a Honda. Like, what's the "bad cloud" that follows them? I'm jw.
|
|
|
|
|
08-11-2008, 06:15 AM
|
#3 | |
|
3" Exhaust
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Romania
Posts: 96
|
Quote:
If u own a Supra, you have a sport`s coupe, if you have a CRX, you just have a small car. A supra gives you a certain status, a crx... there are so many small cars out there... I myself do not agree with those that want the smallest car with the biggest engine. I want to look good in that car too. Otherwise I would have get myself a renault 5 or something.
__________________
1988 yelow manual turbo targa HKS ssqv bov Hose Techniques silicon hoses Forge manual boost controller boost gauge K&N FIPK ACT clutch kit HD-G6 Fidanza lightened flyweel 550cc RC Injectors 255lph Walbro Fuel Pump LIPP Lexus AFM Replica 3" turbo back echaust with divorced downpipe and no cats. Aeromotive FPR Aem Uego Wideband Gauge+O2 sensor |
|
|
|
|
|
08-12-2008, 08:33 PM
|
#4 |
|
3" Exhaust
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Syracuse, NY
Posts: 203
|
If your seriously asking whether you should buy a Supra or a CRX....just get the CRX.
__________________
my car: 1987 brownish Toyota Supra Turbo, automatic 7MGTE engine with ~100k miles on it. |
|
|
|
|
08-11-2008, 12:31 PM
|
#5 | |
|
walbro fp
Join Date: May 2007
Location: USA - Harford County, Maryland
Posts: 481
|
Quote:
I admire the style of a CRX, if I chose to put money into a Honda I would chose the CRX. |
|
|
|
|
|
08-12-2008, 08:11 PM
|
#6 |
|
3" Exhaust
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Brentwood, New York
Posts: 162
|
I had an 89 CRX SI with the B16A Swap. The car was quick (Keyword being quick), but that was $3000 plus the cost of the car. Then I would have to dump another $3000-$4000 to make it faster with a turbo kit (Custom). At that, the car was now fast, but any factory stock turbocharged car that had an intercooler and boost upgrade either wiped me or I gave it a good run. Now I have a 91 Supra Turbo that has about $1500 worth of work and it's way faster than my crx was. Especially up top. The CRX was a killer off the line, but had nothing after 110. The supra is a beast around those speeds. By the way, you wanna buy mine?
__________________
'91 Turbo Targa 5 Spd. '87 Corolla GT-S 5 Spd '91 Accord Daily Driver 5 Spd Soon to be rebuilt (All to some extent) |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Help Me Decide!!! | SICKY_SUPRA | Drifting | 2 | 02-07-2007 09:18 PM |
| Supra V-8 conversion | zmzmzm | MKIII Supra | 55 | 06-23-2006 01:11 PM |
Hybrid Mode
