Help me decide!

supra_91 · 08-10-2008, 12:11 AM

supra or turbo.....hmmm

supra of course. your question should be, Do i wanna be a ricer, who in my opinion gives the car world a bad name, or a own a car that lives up to its name. You decide.

but you forgot the main con of the supra......BHG

supra_91 · 08-10-2008, 12:12 AM

sorry but this is perfect for this thread

Conspicuous-D · 08-10-2008, 02:11 AM

LMAO. Haha. How do ricers give the car community a bad name though?

Chambers · 08-10-2008, 09:11 PM

...

There are many reasons, but without going into details and insulting somebody, I will leave it at that.

This is how I see it, you can make a fast Honda for very little money, but in the end, you still have a Honda. Even if you have a nice Honda people still just see it as a Honda, there is this bad cloud that follows them, its a shame because they are decent cars.

A Supra on the other hand, with the correct amount of money and time can be the nicest thing on the road, and people will respect that. The only problem is that the Supra is sometimes abused and it takes a lot of money to get them to a point where you can be worry free.

So its up to you, I my self would have a Honda as a gas saver, and the Supra as my car, lol.

supra_91 · 08-11-2008, 01:52 AM

like chambers said, it all depends on how much money you are willing to dish out. supra's are a money pit because everything is expensive, unlike the honda

Conspicuous-D · 08-11-2008, 05:22 AM

I still don't understand what's so bad about having a Honda. Like, what's the "bad cloud" that follows them? I'm jw.

azerty · 08-11-2008, 06:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Conspicuous-D

I still don't understand what's so bad about having a Honda. Like, what's the "bad cloud" that follows them? I'm jw.

Let`s put it this way...
If u own a Supra, you have a sport`s coupe, if you have a CRX, you just have a small car.
A supra gives you a certain status, a crx... there are so many small cars out there...
I myself do not agree with those that want the smallest car with the biggest engine. I want to look good in that car too. Otherwise I would have get myself a renault 5 or something.

Chambers · 08-11-2008, 12:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Conspicuous-D

I still don't understand what's so bad about having a Honda. Like, what's the "bad cloud" that follows them? I'm jw.

Don't get me wrong, theres nothing bad about owning a Honda, its just the typical owners are the "bad cloud" and a general profile for a Honda owner is not the best one.

I admire the style of a CRX, if I chose to put money into a Honda I would chose the CRX.

08-10-2008, 12:11 AM	#1
supra_91 Lexus & 550's Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Illinois Posts: 521	supra or turbo.....hmmm supra of course. your question should be, Do i wanna be a ricer, who in my opinion gives the car world a bad name, or a own a car that lives up to its name. You decide. but you forgot the main con of the supra......BHG __________________ 91 N/A automatic supra;K&N FIPK;2.5" custom exhaust;no cat;pacesetter header;eibach springs;tokico "blues";MKIV TT rims

08-10-2008, 12:12 AM	#2
supra_91 Lexus & 550's Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Illinois Posts: 521	sorry but this is perfect for this thread __________________ 91 N/A automatic supra;K&N FIPK;2.5" custom exhaust;no cat;pacesetter header;eibach springs;tokico "blues";MKIV TT rims

08-10-2008, 09:11 PM	#4
Chambers walbro fp Join Date: May 2007 Location: USA - Harford County, Maryland Posts: 481	... There are many reasons, but without going into details and insulting somebody, I will leave it at that. This is how I see it, you can make a fast Honda for very little money, but in the end, you still have a Honda. Even if you have a nice Honda people still just see it as a Honda, there is this bad cloud that follows them, its a shame because they are decent cars. A Supra on the other hand, with the correct amount of money and time can be the nicest thing on the road, and people will respect that. The only problem is that the Supra is sometimes abused and it takes a lot of money to get them to a point where you can be worry free. So its up to you, I my self would have a Honda as a gas saver, and the Supra as my car, lol. __________________ Whats in the garage, well.... in the yard. 1986.5 Toyota Supra - NA - 5 spd 1986 Ford Ranger Lowrider - 5 spd 1984 Ford Ranger XLT - 7" Lift - 4X4 - Auto "Stuck in the 80's"

08-11-2008, 01:52 AM	#5
supra_91 Lexus & 550's Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Illinois Posts: 521	like chambers said, it all depends on how much money you are willing to dish out. supra's are a money pit because everything is expensive, unlike the honda __________________ 91 N/A automatic supra;K&N FIPK;2.5" custom exhaust;no cat;pacesetter header;eibach springs;tokico "blues";MKIV TT rims

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Help Me Decide!!!	SICKY_SUPRA	Drifting	2	02-07-2007 09:18 PM
Supra V-8 conversion	zmzmzm	MKIII Supra	55	06-23-2006 01:11 PM

08-10-2008, 02:11 AM	#3
Conspicuous-D Stock Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: CA Posts: 3	LMAO. Haha. How do ricers give the car community a bad name though?

08-11-2008, 05:22 AM	#6
Conspicuous-D Stock Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: CA Posts: 3	I still don't understand what's so bad about having a Honda. Like, what's the "bad cloud" that follows them? I'm jw.