10-30-2009, 07:21 PM
|
#3 |
|
Intake
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Canada, Alberta
Posts: 32
 |
a 94 would be a mk4 and it comes with a 2jz which would not be practical for the mk2 chasis as it maxes out around 450rwhp. I'd suggest getting an mk3 shell as the chasis and it will easily be accomated into the engine bay with some new mounts. Or else like previously stated go with something else in the m series, mk2s come with 5m so why not try a 7m out of a mk3.
|
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| what do you think of this setup? | Jareduhhhh | MKIV Supra | 4 | 02-19-2009 10:38 AM |
| 1990 supra turbo engine issues help | jespat | Non-Generation Specific Questions | 4 | 01-24-2008 02:37 AM |
| transplant a 3.0 celica supra turbo engine | Carl_Silva | MKII Supra | 2 | 10-27-2006 08:30 PM |
| Celica Supra Turbo engine | Midlifer | MKIII Supra | 1 | 03-05-2006 10:32 AM |
Threaded Mode