Supra Turbo engine from 94 into MKII

Beals · 10-30-2009, 07:21 PM

a 94 would be a mk4 and it comes with a 2jz which would not be practical for the mk2 chasis as it maxes out around 450rwhp. I'd suggest getting an mk3 shell as the chasis and it will easily be accomated into the engine bay with some new mounts. Or else like previously stated go with something else in the m series, mk2s come with 5m so why not try a 7m out of a mk3.

Suprademon · 11-14-2009, 09:26 PM

It can and has been done. I agree that if you go radical, it will require some beefing of the rear end and probably a solid drive shaft. It will require modifications and $$$. If your interested, goto celicasupra.com
and do some searches. You'll find several people who have completed this build.

gteduck · 01-26-2010, 04:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Beals

a 94 would be a mk4 and it comes with a 2jz which would not be practical for the mk2 chasis as it maxes out around 450rwhp.

HOLY CRAP!!!! I want some of what your on!! I'm sick of reallity!!! 450hp is not stock!!!!!
very easy to get but not factory. even with all restictions of it does it really make that much, COME ON?

CanadianBak'inSupra · 01-27-2010, 02:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gteduck

HOLY CRAP!!!! I want some of what your on!! I'm sick of reallity!!! 450hp is not stock!!!!!
very easy to get but not factory. even with all restictions of it does it really make that much, COME ON?

if i had a guess... i would say maby 300rwhp
car gets 320hp, with TT

87TT · 01-28-2010, 08:22 AM

actually the 2jz makes 280 horses stock
same as the 1jz

cre · 01-29-2010, 02:39 AM

Pretty big differences in torque though.

11-14-2009, 09:26 PM	#2
Suprademon Stock Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: Oklahoma Posts: 14	It can and has been done. I agree that if you go radical, it will require some beefing of the rear end and probably a solid drive shaft. It will require modifications and $$$. If your interested, goto celicasupra.com and do some searches. You'll find several people who have completed this build. __________________

01-29-2010, 02:39 AM	#6
cre Toyota Racing Development Join Date: Apr 2007 Posts: 5,038	Pretty big differences in torque though. __________________ If something breaks or you need to contact a member of the administration please post HERE. Unless it's a private or administration matter please post it on the forum. It benefits no one else if car related questions aren't posted for future users and takes away from the time I'm able to spend helping on the rest of the forum. If you're so inclined I'm always more than happy to accept tips via PayPal. Tip Jar --->

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
what do you think of this setup?	Jareduhhhh	MKIV Supra	4	02-19-2009 10:38 AM
1990 supra turbo engine issues help	jespat	Non-Generation Specific Questions	4	01-24-2008 02:37 AM
transplant a 3.0 celica supra turbo engine	Carl_Silva	MKII Supra	2	10-27-2006 08:30 PM
Celica Supra Turbo engine	Midlifer	MKIII Supra	1	03-05-2006 10:32 AM

10-30-2009, 07:21 PM	#1
Beals Intake Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Canada, Alberta Posts: 32	a 94 would be a mk4 and it comes with a 2jz which would not be practical for the mk2 chasis as it maxes out around 450rwhp. I'd suggest getting an mk3 shell as the chasis and it will easily be accomated into the engine bay with some new mounts. Or else like previously stated go with something else in the m series, mk2s come with 5m so why not try a 7m out of a mk3.

01-28-2010, 08:22 AM	#5
87TT Intake Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Winnipeg MB Posts: 45	actually the 2jz makes 280 horses stock same as the 1jz