what do you think is the best supra

MK3 POWER ALL THE WAY BABY!!! ;)

hell no its MKIV man

i have to agree with supra girl on this one MKIII is the best, of course i want an mkIV just to piss off my one friend. He is such a dumbass sometimes, he cries he wants a supra, and instead of spending his 16,000 or whatever he financed for his pontiac sunfart, he could have put in a bid on a supra on ebay. Now that i bring that up to him everytime i see him, he gets so mad.

i like the body on the mk3 but the interior of the mk4. stock to stock i'd pick up the mk4......thats why i picked up an mk3, because shes going to be no where near stock.

you,ve all got to be kidding me :blink:

the mark IV by a foot long. the mark three is quite nice and the first supra i will purchase, though the mark IV looks so more complete, and a done up one more i grabbing than a mark III, the oldies look like bugdet mobiles (though a greater satisfaction on beating a ferrari, i dont doubt that :lol: :P B) )

budget mobiles :( , wow makes me feel like my car is right up there with the dodges aries k car, i'm gonna go sit in the corner and cry now.

budget mobile that you cant afford yet?? :blink:

yeah yeah you ban all have a sook and cry though no one can deny the truth, huh, cant afford it you say well ahhhhhh shite :unsure:

drive 1 of each at least. then...

actually now that you mention it monkeyman, i would prefer the mkIII to the newer one, it might just be litlle better on the fuel for starters

as long as ur foot isnt too heavy...

good point made. i was watching a show and they reakon that poeple who speed only actually get to places a few minutes faster, and go through a crap load of fuel, which aint worth it. :huh:
(providng your not going 200mph down the school zone :lol: )

isn't the mark 3 a smaller car? with a smaller chassis? then isn't it easier for road handling? with a turbo? then that does sound better but can u put in a twin turbo in there?

it depends on track width, not so much as "smaller". wider and lower reduces body roll against corners. single turbo can be best for top end high hp, while in my experience twins are better for street use. it depends on how you have your car setup. there are just too many combinations out there....

would a 1997 toyota supra twin turbo good for curcuit use? i would like to race proffessionaly... but im only a freshman in high school. HELP ME OUT GUYS!! (and girls, sorry suprra)

i'd say so, i reackon a 97 supra could beat any mkIII :P

i reckon the 7mgte is the worst engine out there for drinking petrol LOL

and they're heavier than the mk4
but i mean c'mon... where did they get the idea for the mk4 LOL... it in no way resembles a mk3 and plus.. the mk3 has wayyyyyyyy more luxury than a mk4 ;)

let the flamefest begin :lol:


for the track i would use a mk4.... but for drifting.. altho more difficult... the mk3.. coz it's wayyyyyy more fun lol

did you guys read a surpa inthe autosalon a couple of years ago or somtin', there was a auto supra with 532hp at the rear wheels, single turbo and it done around 6 litres per 100km's :o

try owning a tiburon. that bastard car had worse gas(petrol) mileage that any other car ive owned. at 60mph the tach read 3k rpm in 6TH gear. max highway range was 300mi. on 16 gal of gas. the supras been able to get 350+mi lately. except for last night...heehee

u hit 6th gear at 60 mph? r u okay bro? were u drinking? just imagine him accelerate!! haha! i would walk faster then ever. SUPERSUPRA U SPELLED SUPRA WRONG IN A SUPRA FORUM!!! we should kick make fun of and ban u for the rest of your life and keep u from look at a supra... its horrible. its unthinkable. i cant believe it... ( :lol: ) whats so good about having a wider and heavier car? does it have more pros than cons? (dont u guys think the mkiii kinda sorta looks like the old ferrari's in the front?)

i drink all the time. esspecially when im drunk :blink: wider gives better ground control as long as the car isnt too tall. heavier makes for a smoother ride on high speeds. the tib got scary between 130-140mph.

Ive driven all of them except the MK1.. :) To me i dont much care for the handling or acceleration of the newer ones..I guess its just the turbo setups.. I currently own a 83MK2 and i have left every MK3,and4 at the lights ive pulled up to and im naturally assperated..sure they caught me buy 3rd gear(only170hp)..Stock engine just a few mods.. Next summer im going to order a crate from the "chimp" ..Race prepped head and block with 11;01 compression..Can you say torque monster!! :blink: Hopfully i should get atleast 250 to 300 out of that set up.. Maybe a 50 to 100 shot of NOS..I dont know..The MK2 seems to corner alot better than the others also.. Plus i want to see you get a MK3 or 4 down to 2500lbs and still be completly street leagal and have stock body parts wth interior..That means no carbon or glass.. If i do that then we are talking 2100 to 2200 or less,easy.. Thats a nice power to weight ratio,Naturally assperated..! B) But its all in the eye of the beholder.. Your choice as long as its a SUPRA!! :P

I must say myself its hard to choose between the MK3 and MK2, but i do agree to me the mk2 handles better.

The only Ferrari that a Supra could beat is one without an engine.

uh,no.

This person is very confused.

if mkIII was better than a '06 or a mkIV then kerry would be president.........that makes no sense but.......oh well who cares!!.................the only TRUE thing is mkIV or mkV definetely whup mkIII.... B)

[QUOTE]Aboyandhiscar: The only Ferrari that a Supra could beat is one without an engine.



ok...........that is THE dumbest thing i ever heard he shound'nt even be talking ....in the redline movie a supra whup'd the crap out a of a ferrari 355 spyder and in another movie a lamborgini Gallardo....SAME SUPRA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

oh yea.....i forgot to tell u my friend in chicago has a corvette c6, a 800 hp mkIV, and a ferrari modina.......and his mkIV has whup'd all of them....my other friend in chicago hac a whoppin 1016 hp mkIV and whups everything in sight.........and my cousin in chicago has a mkIV with every visual upgrade possible on it and a whoppin 750 hp or somethin like that on it............and all of them were bought as stock single turbo mkIV's....is my life awesome or wat i get to freakin ride in em whenever i go over there........

The only reason I have a problem with the MKIV supra is that right now its a me 2 car, sorry but after fast and furious thats what it has become.

so, ur stereotyping a supra as a ricer car?!? do you even own one??